The
Work Package Urban and Periurban Agriculture of the InterDev project
describes experiences in the field of urban agriculture and integrated
urban planning. In view of the multidisciplinary character of much
of the information available it is difficult to limit a focus to any
sub-field in particular.
The
starting point is the description of experiences or the publication
of information that is needed to support the evidence given by the
description of the experiences.
SWOT
Interdev "Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture" intends to
explicitly address strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and constraints
to urban agriculture and integrated urban development in its analysis
of cases. More in particular, it will endeavour to examine to what
extent often-heard criticisms are well founded:
More interest for UA might fuel rural-urban migration. Evidence
exists that most migrants to larger cities come from smaller cities.
Public support to UA could reduce public investments in rural agriculture.
It would appear that UA needs intersectoral co-ordination of current
financial flows much more than major new funding.
UA hampers urban development. We hope to demonstrate that different
UA systems do combine with a range of non-agricultural land uses.
UA threatens public health: contamination risks are caused by crop
and husbandry inputs, products and by-products. These risks must
be addressed. We argue they arise from practices carries out at
wrong places or in the wrong way. Especially risks of zoonoses are
under-researched.
Possible negative environmental impacts: visual untidiness, soil
erosion, destruction of vegetation, depletion of water bodies, and
pollution of resources. Palliating the lack of supportive services
capable plays an important role in overcoming such negatives.

Sustainable
Cities
Large
cities, not villages and towns, will become our main habitat. The
challenge is whether cities can transform themselves into self-regulating,
sustainable systems, as continuing to draw upon ever rarer and ever
further distant natural resources is not an option. There can be
no sustainable world without sustainable cities. Promotion of UA
to reduce the 'ecological footprint' of cities is a serious option,
thus combining environmental goals into an overall urban policy.
Addressing this issue started in Rio with Agenda 21 and continued
at the 1996 UN City Summit in Istanbul. Nowadays, the city's impact
stretches far beyond its physical boundaries. With the increasing
number of mouths to feed, and the increasing cost of transportation,
urban agriculture has an important role to play in contributing
to future social, economical and environmental sustainability of
cities. Waste management plays a crucial role in this. Modern cities
are characterised by a linear metabolism, as opposed to a circular
system that has functioned fore centuries. UA can play an important
role in reducing the amount of waste, re-using what can be re-used,
and recycling the remainder (Deelstra & Girardet 2000). UA can
make a crucial contribution to optimal water management in cities
as green surfaces allow water to drain through the soil.
Prospects
In spite of opposition by some city authorities, often having to
do with a negative impact of UA for the image of the modern city,
UA is alive and kicking in many countries. Now, policies are needed
that focus on encouraging the productivity of open urban spaces,
integrating the various components necessary to make urban agriculture
healthy and sustainable and comparing best practices where necessary.
Also, new marketing initiatives, such as community-supported agriculture,
will be needed to enhance the impact of UA.
In an
analysis of factors restricting further development of UA and sustainable
city development, van den Berg & De Zeeuw: (1998) identified
a number of factors that we propose to specifically address in our
analysis of cases:
Restrictive urban policy, laws and regulations;
Uncertainty about property rights;
Lack of supportive services;
Unfeasible implementation of environmental technologies;
Lack of organisation and representation of urban farmers.
|
Bibliographic References
Berg, L.
van den & H. de Zeeuw. 1998. Urbane landbouw: vele vormen. In:
Heringa, A. et al. Uitdagingen van het stedelijk milieu voor ons werk.
Den Haag: Stichting Nederlandse Vrijwilligers, pp 18-22.
Deelstra,
T. & H. Girardet. 2000. Urban agriculture and sustainable cities.
In: Bakker, N. et al. (eds). 2000. Growing cities, growing food: urban
agriculture on the policy agenda. Deutsche Stiftung fuer internationale
Entwicklung (DSE), Feldafing, Germany.
|